In conclusion, a body responsible for ensuring the provision of health services to a person, disrespects his right to access them, if required as a payment that may be required under the regulation. The entity has the right to be paid are monies that may be required, but not at the of the right to health of a person.... Funding for health services not covered within the statutory schemes, in each specific case. The second case in which a person requires a medical service in need, is when it is not included in the Mandatory Plan that is accessed by a person who lacks the economic capacity partial dental views or complete, temporary or definitively to assume the additional cost share for the service, according to the regulation.

This case was discussed above see section..., so just now noted that the rules regarding when it is understood that person lacks the resources, and how this is being tested, are applicable..... Determination of economic capacity in each case. The concept of load bearable.

 

It  orthodontist san diego  is understood that a person lacks capacity to pay when you do not have the resources to cover certain cost, or when affects their minimum living. As www.smiles4sd.com reiterated in several cases of constitutional jurisprudence, the right to a living wage is not a quantitative issue but dental views qualitative. The subsistence minimum of a person depends on the specific socioeconomic conditions where this is located, as well as the obligations weighing on it. The right to a living wage not only comprises a quantitative element of mere subsistence, but also a qualitative component related to the respect for the dignity human. His assessment, therefore, dental views is not abstract and depend on the specific conditions of the plaintiff.

 

 

 

Given that the minimum is vital, qualitative not quantitative, has protected the right to health of people with an annual income and not insignificant assets, provided that disproportionately affects the stability required economic person. For example, a health service that is constantly needed and the cost of which exceeds half income of the person, or dental views a service that once required, but which is almost twice the monthly income the person. It may happen that the same orthodontist san diego person will be unable to pay a service whose cost is high but if you have economic ability to repay the value of medicines. However, the Court has not granted guardianship in certain events, and the cost to service outside near a fifth of the income of the person.

On the other hand, repeatedly case law has established that the lack of economic capacity in orthodontist san diego head SISBEN presumed beneficiaries. But this factual condition that is presumed in such situations, it may be misleading and, in any case, of service assume. The Court has held, even a subject of special protection, in a precarious situation economic, it does have the ability to pay to assume the cost of the constitutional service if it is not high..... The lack of economic capacity may be temporary or permanent.

 

The constitutional jurisprudence has protected people orthodontist san diego both cases it lacks the financial capacity to bear the cost of the respective treatment, and in those cases it does have the ability to accept it, but not before at which requires access to health services ordered.